In our hyper-connected world, the lines between public information and personal privacy can blur alarmingly fast. A vital reminder of this delicate balance came in August 2024, when the Supreme Court of India issued a timely injunction in the case Kinnori Ghosh @ Anr. vs Union of India & Ors., concerning the RG Kar Medical College incident. The Court directed all social media platforms and electronic media to immediately remove any references to the deceased’s identity—including their name, photographs, and video footage—to protect the dignity of the individual and their grief-stricken loved ones.
The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) swiftly reinforced the Court’s guidance, urging social media companies to comply with utmost urgency. Platforms were also instructed to report back to the ministry on the actions taken in response to the directive. This two-pronged approach—legal mandate coupled with regulatory enforcement—emphasizes how seriously India’s institutions regard dignity in posthumous contexts.
This development holds significant relevance for our digital age, where information can spread globally within seconds. The rapid dissemination of sensitive content—especially involving deceased individuals—can inflict further harm on families navigating grief. By compelling platforms to act responsibly, the Supreme Court and MeitY set an important precedent. It underscores that freedom of expression and connectivity cannot override fundamental human rights.
Ultimately, the incident serves as a sobering reminder: technology’s power demands sensitivity. Social media platforms must evolve not just as spaces of free exchange, but as guardians of dignity. Structured policies, swift compliance, and respect for privacy are essential—because behind every post lies a real human story, and sometimes, a real human tragedy.
Full‑service Delhi & Kolkata law firm with 30+ years’ experience in corporate, regulatory, real estate & litigation counsel.
